The subject of kingship wrote Macbeth in 1605/6 Essay Example for Free (#16056)

The subject of kingship wrote Macbeth in 1605/6 Essay ? William Shakespeare who had already written numerous plays on the subject of kingship wrote Macbeth in 1605/6. This play is a tragedy, much like that of Hamlet, which depicts the murder of a King and all the consequences that follow such a crime. This play was performed before King James VI of Scotland, I of Great Britain, who came to the English throne in 1603. There are all sorts of issues that can be drawn from this fact such as, King James had a fascination with witchcraft, which suggests that Macbeth might have been centred around witches to please the King. Shakespeare spent a lot of his time writing about Kings, especially English ones. The quotation is from Act IV, iii where Malcolm, son of Duncan, is testing Macduff to see whether he is a traitor or not and then, once it is established that Macduff is on Malcolm’s side, they start to plan how they are going to fight Macbeth. The quotation is a list of qualities that Malcolm says a King should have. Then he goes on to say that he has none of these qualities, but this is all part of the trickery he is playing on Macduff. Malcolm knows that Macduff is truthful to him because Malcolm says that he would not have one tyrant, Macbeth, replaced with another, Malcolm, which shows that Macduff is loyal to Scotland, therefore Malcolm, the rightful King, and not Macbeth. No, not to live! O nation miserable, With an untitled tyrant† (Act IV, iii, 103-105) This is the quotation with which Macduff proves to Malcolm his loyalty to him and not Macbeth. Our first encounter with a King in Macbeth is Duncan. The scene is that of a battlefield and the King is directed towards the Captain who is asked to give a report of the victory. The Captain does so and tells the King of the bravery and valour that Macbeth had shown. â€Å"For brave Macbeth – well he deserves that name† (Act I, i, 16) Duncan then proceeds to give the title of Thane of Cawdor to Macbeth after the previous Thane had died during battle. This shows bounty in Duncan because he is giving out a reward to the correct man seeming as Macbeth had fought well in the fight and deserved the reward. Duncan also shows devotion to his people in this scene. At the end of the scene after the Captain had finished his report, because he was injured, Duncan tells his attendants to go and find medical help for the Captain. â€Å"They smack of honour both. Go get him surgeons.† (Act I, i, 45) Another show of this devotion comes at the end of Act I, iv where he is commending Banquo. â€Å"True, worthy Banquo; he is full so valiant, It is a banquet to me. Let’s after him Whose care is gone before to bid us welcome. It is a peerless kinsman.† (Act I, iv, 55-59) Duncan also has temperance and stableness as he never loses his temper and stays level-headed throughout the time he is on stage. He does not get angry and in a production that I saw at my school of Macbeth, Duncan was played as a calm, collected individual who took everything slow and who stayed stable throughout his performance. Also Duncan was played as a blind man, which was not an original idea, and there are uses of language throughout scenes with Duncan that see him refer to other senses such as the following: â€Å"This castle hath a pleasant seat; the air Nimbly and sweetly recommends itself Unto our gentle senses.† (Act I,vi, 1-3) There are also language points in the speeches that Duncan has that suggest he is blind too such as the following quotation: Conduct me to mine host. We love him highly, And shall continue ours graces towards him. By your leave, hostess.† (Act I, vi, 28-31) The language used in the first line of this quotation suggests that Duncan cannot walk alone and needs a guide to take him. In the performance I saw there was always somebody by his side guiding him places because he was being played as a blind man. There is another reference to Duncan’s blindness, â€Å"Who comes here?† (Act I, ii, 46). If Duncan was in fact blind, then he would be level-headed because I could guess that having one less sense has a considerable impact on how someone behaves. Duncan has these qualities: devotion, temperance, stableness and bounty, which suggests that Macbeth does support the claim by Malcolm because Duncan has a selection of the qualities suggested by Malcolm. Macbeth and Malcolm himself have other qualities that Malcolm suggests a King should have, which I will show later on in this essay. Duncan also seems to have the support and general feeling of his people, which would warrant him to be a good King. This is because if the people like a King then he is probably doing the right things that the general population want him to be doing. Therefore, for the people to like him, he must be acting correctly and not be doing things that would not appeal to the general consensus of the people. There is a suggestion of this in the play when Duncan meets Lady Macbeth he makes a little joke about the social problems that he faces being a King: The love that follows us sometime is our trouble, Which still we thank as love. Herein I teach you How you shall bid God ‘ield us for your pains, And thank us for your trouble. (Act I, vi, 10-14) This speech by Duncan is based around the ancient customs of a guest asking something of their guest and then saying that they do not want to trouble them and then the host saying that it is their pleasure. By saying that his people’s love is sometimes his â€Å"trouble,† Duncan is saying that his loving people go to a great deal of trouble for him, and he is troubled by the fact that they take all that trouble. Nevertheless, when people take trouble for him, he knows that they do it because they love their king, so he thanks them for their love. Next, referring to himself royally as â€Å"us,† Duncan jokingly tells Lady Macbeth that he is saying all of this so that, instead of him thanking her for taking trouble, she will thank God and him for giving her trouble. In Machiavellian terms, a good King is one that guarantees the happiness of his people even if he himself is a murdering swine, for example. Also Machiavelli said that a King does not have to have all of the qualities laid out in the quotation. Therefore, Macbeth denies the claim because being a Machiavellian King is not included in the claim but it does make a King a good King. Macbeth is the second King that we come across in Macbeth. He comes to the throne only after committing treason by killing the rightful King in the first place, Duncan. His relationship with Lady Macbeth changes throughout the play. At first it is Lady Macbeth who is evil and persuades Macbeth to murder Duncan, but slowly as the play develops these roles reverse and Macbeth becomes the evil one killing a lot of people and Lady Macbeth becoming cowardly. Macbeth does not seem to have verity because he lies about things that he has done. The first sign of this is in Act II, ii where Macbeth goes along with Lady Macbeth’s plan of going back to their chambers and putting on their night gowns to lie about whether they had been asleep or not when everyone wakes up to find Duncan has been murdered. He lies several times in Act II but one stands out spectacularly, which is (Act II, iii, 105-15). This quotation shows Macbeth lying about his feelings and how he killed the guards in his anger. Macbeth is not at all temperate or stable either. He has momentary lapses into madness where he sees apparitions. Macbeth discovers that the ghost of Banquo is only visible to him and not the others: Why, what care I if thou canst nod! Speak, too! If charnel-houses and our graves must send Those that we bury, back, our monuments Shall be the maws of kites† (Act III, iv, 67-72) The language used by Macbeth suggests the erratic behaviour that Macbeth demonstrates at this point in the play. Macbeth is saying that if all that we bury return from the grave then we will have to feed their remains to birds of prey to eat. Macbeth does not have the qualities, stableness and temperance because Macbeth constantly goes into fits of madness, therefore, extreme personality levels, which is not what a stable and temperate person does, they stay level-headed. Macbeth does not either have mercy. This is obvious because Macbeth kills a lot of people in cold blood simply for his own self-good. Another sign of Macbeth having no mercy is when he kills the entire household of Macduff even though he only wants Macduff dead for being a traitor to him. Macbeth knows Macduff is a traitor because he ran away to England and did not come to the dining of all the Lords in the Kingdom. He tells Lady Macbeth of his spy in Macduff’s household, and in the same speech gives Lady Macbeth the impression that he will have Macduff’s family murdered: â€Å"I hear it by the way. But I will send. There’s not one of them, but in his house I keep a servant fee’d.† (Act III, iv, 129-131) The last line of this quotation shows us that he bribes a servant to spy on Macduff’s house. And further on in this speech Macbeth gives the reference of murdering Macduff’s family: Stepped in so far, that, should I wade no more, Returning were as tedious as to go’er† (Act III, iv, 134-137) Macbeth also murders Young Seyward in battle, which also shows Macbeth’s lack of mercy. Even if Macbeth kills Young Seyward in battle, Macbeth is still killing a child, which does not show mercy. Macbeth not having any of these qualities, verity, temperance, stableness or mercy, denies the claim of Malcolm’s that a King should have the virtues listed in the extract. Macbeth, on the other hand, does have lowliness. His attitude does change throughout the play from good to evil and it is when he is acting as a good person that he has lowliness. He admits that he is wrong several times after he kills Duncan: How is’t with me when every noise appals me? What hands are here! Ha-they pluck out mine eyes! Will all great Neptune’s ocean wash this blood Clean from my hand? No, this my hand will rather The multitudinous seas incarnadine, Making the green one red.† (Act II, ii, 57-63) Macbeth says that his hands are stained with the blood of Duncan, but what he really means is that Macbeth is now stained with the murder of Duncan and he will never be able to wash it from him even with all of God’s will and forgiveness. This reference to â€Å"Neptune’s ocean† actually refers to God but it was thought that God should not be spoken at the time this play was written. Macbeth has devotion in some respects but not in others. He does not have devotion to his country, which is what he should have, but he does have to his wife and to himself. At the beginning of the play Macbeth, however, is devoted to his King and country it seems because he fights and risks his life for them. For his bravery he was awarded Thane of Cawdor by Duncan. Macbeth then becomes a tyrant under the influence of his evil wife. Macbeth kills Duncan and this sets off a chain of events that leads to Macbeth, at the end of the play, being devoted only to himself and to his wife and not to his country, even though he is in command of it. This shows that a person can change and, therefore, maybe develop the qualities needed to be a King, some of which are shown in the quotation from Malcolm. Macbeth in Act III shows perseverance. This is when he says: Stepped in so far, that, should I wade no more, Returning were as tedious as go’er.† (Act III, iv, 135-137) Macbeth is saying that he has already killed a large number of people, he might as well kill a few more because if he stops then people will find out he has been murdering and he will be killed. This shows Macbeth persevering to try to get away from the trouble that he is in, although it is not a very good way of doing it. Macbeth has, lowliness, devotion (in some ways and times) and perseverance. Having these merits supports Malcolm’s claim that a King should have the virtues stated in the extract. In Machiavellian terms Macbeth is not a good King at all because he does not satisfy the greater happiness of the greater number. This is illustrated by everyone in Scotland, by the end of the play, turning against Macbeth and disliking him when Ross says what he does in Act IV, iii, 164-173). The third King in the play is Malcolm. The audience do not see him rule Scotland for very long but there is still a lot of information in Act IV, iii about Malcolm that we, the audience, can extract and analyse. Malcolm comes to the throne of Scotland by turning the grief of Macduff’s into anger so that he could kill Macbeth for Malcolm because Malcolm knew that Macduff was the only man who could kill Macbeth, as he was not born of woman, like the witches told Macbeth. The following lines spoken by Malcolm show this: Let’s make us medicines of our great revenge To cure this deadly grief† (Act IV, iii, 213-215) Malcolm’s first lines in this scene show him as very cowardly and do not give a very good impression of him at first glance. â€Å"Let us seek out some desolate shade, and there Weep our sad bosoms empty.† (Act VI, iii, 1-2) One gets the impression from the phrases, â€Å"desolate shade† and â€Å"Weep our sad bosoms empty† that Malcolm just wants to hide from all the bad things and cry. This is not what a brave man should be doing. Malcolm should be a strong King who would want to fight: Macduff’s first lines are what he should be saying: Hold fast the mortal sword: and like good men Bestride our down-fallen birthdom.† (Act VI, iii, 3-5) By this Malcolm does not seem to be a very courageous King but, as the audience and with the benefit of hindsight because I have read and seen the play, I know that Malcolm is much more of a strategist than a soldier. This shows that Malcolm does not have fortitude because he cannot fight but it does show that Malcolm has intelligence. This means that a King should have intelligence so it denies the claim he makes. Malcolm also has patience because he bides his time with Macduff to make sure that he is dealing with someone loyal to him. This again shows his intelligence and strategic mind as he plays a game with Macduff by saying he would make a bad King and that a King should have the comments made in the claim and that he has none of them. He then knows that if Macduff said, â€Å"don’t worry you should still be king†, then Malcolm knows that Macduff is a traitor to him; whereas if Macduff says, â€Å"fine if you are that bad then do not be King†, Malcolm knows that Macduff is loyal to Scotland, therefore him, because it demonstrates that Macduff does not want to replace one tyrant with another. This takes a lot of time and Malcolm has the patience to do this. The uncovering of Malcolm’s plan is in Act IV, iii, 100-138. Justice is also a quality that Malcolm possesses because he is looks and wants to solve the problems in Scotland, under the leadership of Macbeth. â€Å"But Macbeth is† (Act IV, iii, 17-18) These two lines show that Malcolm knows Macbeth is a bad person and ruler and therefore he wants to bring justice to Scotland by bringing Macbeth down. This quality supports the claim. Malcolm, at the end of the play, says: Henceforth be earls, the first Scotland In such an honour named.† Act V, vi, 101-103) This shows bounty in Malcolm because he rewards all of his loyal people, who helped him defeat Macbeth, the right to be called earls. Malcolm rewards the right people in this case just like Duncan does to Macbeth at the beginning of the play. Malcolm also shows devotion from Act IV on. He shows devotion to his country, Scotland, by wanting to save it from the rule of a tyrant, Macbeth. The evidence is the quotation, Act IV, iii, 115-137). Malcolm gathers up an English army and spends a lot of time testing Macduff all to save Scotland from Macbeth’s murderous terror. Malcolm by having, devotion, bounty, patience and justice, supports the claim that Malcolm himself says in Act IV because he becomes King and he has some of the qualities that he mentions. He could also have temperance and stableness but there is some evidence to suggest that he gets a little mad towards the end of Act IV, iii: â€Å"Be this the whetstone of your sword; let grief Convert to anger; blunt not the heart, enrage it.† (Act IV, iii, 227-228) â€Å"Enrage it,† suggests that Malcolm is getting angry so that when he comes to fight he can let that anger go and perform well. Malcolm also has intelligence, which in my opinion, is also a quality that no King should be without. I think this because if the leader of the country does not possess intelligence then he will most probably not know how to rule the country and therefore, be a bad King who, in Machiavellian terms, will not provide the greater happiness of the greater number in his Kingdom. This denies the claim that a King should only have these qualities because intelligence, in my opinion, should be the most important merit. In a few of Shakespeare’s plays there is a good, rightful saint-like King, who is no good at ruling. This is the same as Edward the Confessor, who was seen as the holiest of Kings that could heal people’s illnesses by simply touching them, but who ruined his Kingship by bringing his dynasty to the ground. Edward is held up, in Macbeth, as a figure for comparison. Being a holy King is a good thing but the King must be able to find a dynasty and rule his people to guarantee their greater happiness. In that way, Edward is a really holy and religious King, which is a good thing to be, as well as others, but this quality is not on the list. The following is a quotation from Macbeth that gives a direct reference to Edward, King of England at the time. â€Å"There are a crew of wretched souls That stay his cure. Their maladies convinces The great assay of art; but at his touch, Such sanctity hath heaven given his hand, They presently amend.† (Act IV, iii, 141-145) In this way, Macbeth demonstrates to the audience that it is good to be a holy King, along with other merits, but this quality is not on the list so it shows that Macbeth is denying the claim because there are other qualities that a King should have other than those that Malcolm states. Using all of this analysis of the play, Macbeth, I can come to the conclusion that Macbeth denies the claim made by Malcolm. Malcolm says, in this quotation, that a King should have the qualities that he lists. The Kings in Macbeth do have all of the qualities he lists between them but they also have other qualities that are important to being a King and there are also other qualities that the Kings do not have and that aren’t listed that I think a king should have, such as intelligence and being religious. Some people might say that because the Kings in Macbeth do have the qualities described in the extract that Macbeth supports the claim. This is, however, wrong in my opinion because the Kings, in Macbeth, have other qualities that a suitable King should have that need to be thought of in answering this question and, as I have said, there are other virtues a King should have to rule a kingdom. Macbeth, William Shakespeare, ed. G.K. Hunter, Penguin, 1967 The subject of kingship wrote Macbeth in 1605/6. (2017, Oct 21).

Are Kids overmedicated Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Are Kids overmedicated - Essay Example In this paper I will be attempting shade more light on the whole topic of overmedication in kids by answering the questions. There is evidence pointing at the fact that pediatricians are prescribing over ten million antibiotics for unnecessary cases e.g. common flu, asthma and even in some cases headache. The Centers for Disease Control also report that over ten thousand kids are on psychostimulant drugs such as Ritalin. It was estimated that approximately 7.5% of children in the United States in the age ranges of six years to seventeen were using medicines for behavior and emotional problems as at 2011. The number of children on psychostimulants has been rising sharply in the past few years. What this means is that there are many children out here receiving either antibiotics, drugs for behavioral problems or many others in large numbers that can be avoided. It points to an interesting fact; either the psychiatrists or medical doctors are overwhelmed or too busy to take enough time and provide quality service. It could also mean that parents are very busy give their children healthy home environments. Also schools must take a portion of the blame for their busy schedules that limit recess time or completely do not have activities for children to relax. Pharmaceutical companies should be blamed largely for the overmedication being reported in kids due to their marketing campaigns which are mostly driven by profitmaking (Insel, 2014). The consequences of overmedication can be devastating considering the health of these kids who are still growing. Overt and under-treatment are some of the consequences. Due to carelessness or clinicians being to busy, the children are subjected to medication even when conditions can be manage by therapy for instance in the case of psychostimulants. Antibiotic over or misuse may arise especially in situations where diagnosis is very uncertain e.g. in infections of the ears.

Leadership & the Role of Managers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Leadership & the Role of Managers - Essay Example 4. She is an innovator. I have observed, on more than one occasion a creative and innovative solution is required to solve day to day issues. It is not just application of technology or application of mind but more than that. Innovate in her own small but effective way. 5. She is an entrepreneur. The ideas and opinions innovated or solutions worked out for the day to day issues are implemented boldly. This requires an entrepreneurial skill that comprises of boldness in action and clarity in thought. 1. She delays or procrastinates decisions. Where she is not sure instead hunting around and finding a solution immediately, she invariably drags the decision until it is clear to her by itself or somebody else clears it. 2. She has no time for new technologies happening else where in the world. There are developments happening else where and better methods adopted by various people all over the place. This she is not able to identify and apply since she finds time a rare specimen to study and gather the knowledge required. This would weaken her further with passage of time. 3. Her approach towards people management is one of intuition and personal.

Overview of Second Century Christianity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Overview of Second Century Christianity - Essay Example One of great import was the communicatio idiomatum. What were the scriptures and how were they to be interpreted and understood was such a vital question. Many solutions were being out forward and the church fathers of this period had had to propose and refute. The senses of scripture emerged and became part of interpretive strategy but not without their own specific problems. The influence of the Greek and platonic times were still evident in society and was making their impact felt even in the Christian faith. Gnosticism would emerge and be dealt with but never with complete success. The church continued to grow and with the passing of time the various councils began to play a critical role in the defense of authentic faith, and the role of liturgies would become invaluable. Christianity, which started as a first century Jewish cult spread rapidly over the Greco-Roman world. Its early period can be divided into two definite phases. First is the apostolic period. The Post Apostolic period stretched from the late first century until the Council of Nicaea in 325. The area of our focus namely the 2nd century fits into the Post Apostolic period. This was also known as the Ante Nicene period. ... Pauline Christianity and Gnostic Christianity flourished. This century presented challenges to the church fathers in terms of persecution, doctrinal conflicts other than the very challenge of authoritatively and resolutely continuing the great commission in the absence of the apostles. What was the need for communicatio idiomatum? One of the functions of Bishops during this period was to refute heresies. These heresies were largely Christological. They had a problem understanding the mystery of Christ being divine as well as human. For instance Docetism believed that Jesus’s humanity was an illusion, which was refuted by Ignatius of Antioch in AD 110. â€Å"Many groups were dualistic, maintaining that reality was composed into two radically opposing parts: matter, usually seen as evil, and spirit, seen as good. Orthodox Christianity, on the other hand, held that both the material and spiritual worlds were created by God and were therefore both good, and that this was represen ted in the unified divine and human natures of Christ.†1 These arose due to the mystery of Christ. Theologians assign the name mystery to revealed truths that are beyond the power of natural understanding. The earliest of Christians grappled with the mystery of the nature of Christ and the Gnostics of the 2nd century had a real issue with this. The fact that one person can have two natures is problematic. Terminology is a culprit. There is terminology for being divine and there is terminology for being human but no terminology for being both at the same time. Theological language of that day was insufficient for this purpose. The easiest of explanations is to say that he sometimes acted as a human and

Research two artists Kim Koster and Nicoletta Vevimesi Paper

Two artists Kim Koster and Nicoletta Vevimesi - Research Paper Example Koster is highly experimental; he doesn’t like to settle for conventional. His artwork speaks volumes of his risk taking nature and that is why he likes to work with various kinds of media for his artwork. Three of his most famous art pieces; ‘99 Rooms’, ‘Strahlende Orte’ and ‘Ana Somnia’ are living proofs of Koster’s tentative nature. The theme that is prominent in his art is the apocalyptic sentiment. To portray this, he uses symbolic exaggeration and countless surrealistic elements. His work might look mysterious to many buts it’s open for interpretation and debate. For instance, in Ana Somnia, the artwork takes the viewer into the dream land and one figure takes the form of another and the cycle continues, a lot of stories and interpretations can be formed. Three of the most famous art projects by Kim are shown in the images below. Nicoletta Veronesi loves to play with color and portrays them in both traditional and nontraditional media. She was born in Milan and educated at New York City at the Arts Student League (Veronesi, 2012). She expressed her art through figurative and abstract painting. Graffiti style of painting in New York City inspired her and that is the reason she worked for eight years in vernacular. Collage, painting, photography and ceramic are the elements she uses for her artwork. Wearable art, fabric design, furniture design and artist’s books are also her medium of art. The tone and the emotions in her artwork are always positive. There are certain elements in her work that stir emotions of joy and happiness when people look at them. Even those who are not familiar with the technicalities of art feel a positive vibe from her work. The colors are usually bright and ecstatic and they invoke the same feelings in the viewers. Such delightful themes are very obvious in her work, so vivid. It is not one of those art pieces where one has to look at it

Theories of International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Theories of International Relations - Essay Example 42). As a result of the complexity in international relations, this field of study has attracted numerous scholars who come up with theories to explain international behavior among states. For most theorists of international relations the state is the primary player that determines the direction in international matters. Olson and Groom (1992, pp. 274) state that the policies adopted by a certain state go along way into shaping its relationship with other states, thus molding international relations. The field of international relations widely accepts anarchy as one of the possible explanations for behavior in international politics. Different theorists of international relations have varying concepts on the issue of anarchy. To some pessimists, anarchy is totally appalling, while to some optimists, anarchy can be advantageous to a state. More specifically, there is a â€Å"myth† of international anarchy that provides that ‘Anarchy is what states make of it’. Acco rding to Weber (2004, pp. 63) this myth of international relations holds that the outcomes of global anarchy vary from one state to another. This means that one cannot predict how anarchy will affect a given state, since different states have different responses to anarchy. Essentially, anarchy may cause either cooperation or conflicts among states, depending on the policies of each individual state on international behavior (Griffith, 1999; pp. 154). Accordingly, it is critical to have deeper insight into the concept of international anarchy; its meaning, origins, the role it plays in international relations. It essential to consider how individual states have it in their power to shape international relations by choosing the consequences that anarchy is going to have on them and other states they interact with. For most people, especially those not concerned with the study of international relations, the term anarchy is associated with disorganization, violence, and absence of law s to govern the actions of people. This means that most people view anarchy as being characterized by severe social and political instability, meaning that anarchy is a threat to international order and security (Griffiths, 1999; pp. 145). With such a mindset, anarchy is depicted as the very opposite of civilization and most people would rather do without anarchy. However, in the study of international relations, different scholars have different views concerning international anarchy and its consequences on international politics. Some see anarchy as negative, while others see it a positive. Yet for some, international anarchy can have either negative or positive effects or both on a state and in the entire field of international politics. Nevertheless, all theorists of international anarchy agree that anarchy is caused by lack of a universal government. In the field of international relations, anarchy is not necessarily considered a theory; rather it is taken as a myth by theorist s of international relations. Theorists of international anarchy hold that the world is made of sovereign states, each yielding power over its territory, people, and resources. According to Brown (2002, pp. 145,) such a sovereign state holds the ultimate power over its area of jurisdiction and no other authority, whether domestic or international, should challenge its position. Therefore, as far as international politics of anarchy are concerned, all states are sovereign, but the degrees of sovereignty vary from state to state. International independence among states varies, according to the political structures of

In the Midst of Pressures Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

In the Midst of Pressures - Essay Example He was concerned about how the people would react. He was already a hated man, being a white man and a police officer in a foreign land. He has become, as the storyteller reveals, a tyrant who has lost his freedom; being pushed by the people to do things against his will. He knows that as an officer, he should follow protocol, get near the elephant and test if it is still harmful or it is already safe for it to be left alone. However, the area where the elephant was eating is muddy and it would be dangerous for the officer to get near the elephant because there is the possibility that he would be trampled upon like the Indian killed by the beast. Although he was not concerned about his safety, he was thinking what a laughing stock he would become in his time of death when he gets killed by the elephant. Therefore, in this certain circumstance, he decided to kill the elephant even though that was not really his intention. Similarly, in the second story, the main character gave in to p ressure. When Langston was left all alone in his seat, with his friend looking down at him from the platform and the older members of the congregation and the priest wanting him to move forward and receive his salvation, the young man went to the podium.